Shaykh al-Islām explains where different groups go to extremes, thus causing division within the Ummah, and he draws parallels with how the previous religions divided even after Allāh granted knowledge to them.
“Those who were given the Scriptures did not differ except out of mutual jealousy and hatred (bagyan) after knowledge had come to them.”
[Ālī ʿImrān, 3:19]
Informing that their differing arose after the coming of knowledge that made clear to them as to what they should steer clear of – for indeed Allāh does not let a people become misguided after He guided them except after telling them what they should steer clear of. And informing that they differed only due to the reason of mutual jealousy and hatred. Al-Bagy means to exceed the proper bounds as was indicated by ibn ʿUmar (in his commentary to the verse): ‘arrogance and jealousy’ – this arising due to differing ijtihāds that were not based upon knowledge. What is not meant by al-Bagy is the permissible difference that arises between the scholars for al-Bagy is either the neglect or omission of the truth, or exceeding the proper bounds. Exceeding the proper bounds either by leaving an obligatory action or by performing a forbidden action and it is known that splitting and disunity is the outcome of this.
An example of this lies in what He said about the People of the Book:
“And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant but they abandoned (or forgot) a portion of the Message that was sent to them. So we planted enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection.”
So He informed us that in their forgetting/abandoning a portion of the Message – meaning leaving a portion of that which they were commanded with – lay the reason for their enmity and hatred.
This is what is occurring amongst the adherents of our religion and it can be found amongst the various parties that differ with regards to their principles and many subsidiary matters – found amongst the scholars and the worshippers – to the point that one finds a resemblance to the two nations about whom one says about the other: ‘They are upon nothing.’
This is like what we find amongst the legal jurists who stick to the outward actions of the religion, and those that take to the path of tasawwuf who stick to the inward actions of the religion for each one of these negates the path of the other and claims that they are not from the People of the Religion, or they oppose the other in a way of opposing of those who do not consider the other to be part of the religion. There occurs between them enmity and hatred.
This is because Allāh has ordered that the heart be purified just as He has ordered that the body be purified. Both these aspects of purification are from the religion that Allāh has commanded and made obligatory. Allāh said:
“They are the ones whose hearts Allāh does not wish to purify.”
إِنَّمَا الْمُشْرِكُونَ نَجَسٌ ﴿٢٨﴾
“Indeed the polytheists are impure and filthy”
So we find that the concern of many of the legal jurists and the worshipper is only the purification of the body, and he goes beyond the requirement of the sharīʿah with respect to his concern and action. And he leaves what he has been commanded and recommended with respect to the purification of the heart, and he does not understand purification except in this bodily aspect.
And we find that the concern of many of the Ṣufīs is the purification of the heart only, to the extent that he will go beyond the requirement of the Sharīʿah with respect to his concern and action. And he leaves what he has been commanded and recommended with respect to the purification of the body.
So the first group go to the extreme of wasting water and considering to be impure that which is not impure, and staying away from that which has not been legislated to stay away from, this despite their hearts containing different shades of jealousy, arrogance and hatred towards their brothers. In this there is a clear resemblance to the Jews.
The other group goes to the extreme of negligence, they go to great extents to safeguard the heart to the point that they consider ignorance of that which is obligatory to know – such as the evil from which it is obligatory to steer clear of – from those things that safeguard the heart (from actually desiring that evil). In this, they do not differentiate between safeguarding the heart from desiring evil, and safeguarding the heart through its knowing the evil and it’s knowing that with which it has been commanded. Then alongside this negligence and ignorance they do not preserve themselves from the impure things and therefore establish the obligatory purification in the way of the Christians.
So enmity has occurred between these two groups due to their leaving a portion of what they have been commanded with, and due to their bagy – which is to exceed the correct bounds, either by ignoring or omitting the truth, or by enmity and oppression. Bagy sometimes occurs amongst some people, or sometimes with regards to the rights of Allāh – both of these are implied. This is why He said, “out of mutual jealousy and hatred,” for each group was displaying bagy to the other by not acknowledging the others right and not refraining from showing enmity to the other. Allāh said:
“Mankind was one nation and Allāh sent Messengers as bringers of glad-tidings and warners. And He revealed with them the Book in truth so that they may judge amongst mankind in that which they differed. And only those to whom it was given differed concerning it after clear proofs came to them through hatred, one to another.”
“(Always) turning in repentance to Him, and be afraid an dutiful to Him: and establish the prayers and do not be of the polytheists – of those who split up their religion and became sects, each sect rejoicing in that which is with it.”
This is because each party of the polytheists used to worship whatsoever god their desires dictated as Allāh said:
“O Messengers! Eat of the goodly things and do righteous deeds. Indeed, I am Well-Acquainted with what you do. And Verily! This, your religion, is one religion and I am your Lord, so keep your duty to Me. But they have broken their religion into sects, each group rejoicing in what it has.” [al-Muʾminūn, 23:51-52]
So it becomes clear the way of unity is by means of gathering all of the religion and acting upon it in its entirety – that is worshipping Allāh Alone without any partners as He ordered, inwardly and outwardly.
The way to disunity is by leaving a portion of that which the servant has been commanded with, and by al-bagy.
The result of unity is: the Mercy and Pleasure of Allāh, His sending ṣalāh upon the servants, and happiness in this world and in the hereafter, and white faces (on the Day of Judgement).
The result of disunity is: the Punishment of Allāh, His Curse, and black faces, and the Messenger (ﷺ) declaring himself free of them.
This is one of the proofs that consensus is a definitive proof, for when they unite then they are all obeying Allāh in this and have Mercy showered on them. And there cannot be obedience to Allāh and His Mercy by way of an action that He has not commanded, in either belief, saying or action. For if there were to be a saying or action upon which they agreed that had not been commanded by Allāh, then this would not be obedience to Allāh and neither would it be a means of His Mercy. Abū Bakr al-ʿAzīz depended upon this proof in the beginning of his ‘al-Tanbīh.’